I think I'm now ready to unleash a cache or 2 onto the community
I have obtained landowner permission and pretty much have the cache assembled, so I just need to go about finding an actual hiding spot, taking the GPS co-ords then getting it published.
The first cache I have is an Opencache branded container and logbook that came with a Garmin etrex 10 which was a gift from Santa.
As there don't appear to be any Opencaches in the Swindon area, I'm tempted to list it over on that site, seeing as it's Opencache branded. I've never found a single Opencache so I'm hoping this won't count against me in the review?
Also, how do people feel about having a cache listed on both GC and OC websites? Would this cause me any issues?
I'm also worried that all the Opencaching branding might confuse a GC cacher looking for it - should I put in 2 log books do you think?
The first question I can answer straight out, which is you will not have any problem to get the cache published Garmin's Opencaching.com. The review process is different to GC and other hosting sites. On the Garmin site the caches are reviewed by established members who basically give it a 'yes', or a 'no - plus reasons why a no', and if after 24hrs you have more yes's than no's then the cache is published. It's very easy to get a cache published on there unless you have upset the general caching community in some way, in which you will get a load of no's just because they don't like you.
Answers to the other two questions are just my own opinion only...
I would not personally list the same cache on both listing sites. Some people do, but I don't see the point. I know people who have got a bit upset when they have rushed out to find what they think is a new cache on one site, and when they find it they realize they have found it already on another site, so a wasted trip. That is just one example why I would not do that.
If you do decide to host on both sites, then I would just use the one log book, but have it written clearly on the book, or on another piece of paper with the book, that the cache can be logged on both sites.
opencaching.com is not popular around here. You will not have many finds on the cache if you host on there only. But saying that, you will get a few finds by some die hard cachers who travel far and try to find as many caches as they can over all of the listing sites.
Good luck with your first placements. I will get out and find them at some point, even if I am not rushing out for the FTF. If you're hiding around Swindon I have almost no hope to get there for a FTF
Post by pigdogboyandgirls on Jan 2, 2014 13:57:56 GMT
No there isn't any local to us. If you do place it as an open cache you do not have to worry about the constraints that geocaching impose. But if you are to do it as a joint one you have to stick to both rules. I think there are some that are listed on both sites, but someone who open caches more would be able to tell you for sure.
And if you can make the following amendment that would be great!
If you're hiding around Swindon I have almost no hope to get there for a FTF
I'd be a bit disappointed if pigdogboyandgirls or sparklefingers weren't the FTF! Thanks for the feedback it's probably easiest to keep each cache to one database I guess...
I'm quite excited about going to find a hiding location, I would have done it yesterday except the rain prevented our planned walk
I would just add one more thing. If you did list it on Geocaching and another site, DON'T mention this on your geocaching listing, as they are a bit sensitive (bless them) about other sites and it may not get published.
OK, two things
I'm with Gackt - I visited a site to find some Garmin caches only to realise, I had been there before a few years ago to find the same caches but they were just geocaches (at the time); so no to listing on more than one site
I'm still waiting for flood waters recede before I can place my first cache... in the meantime I have another couple of n00b questions about placements, which I'm hoping locals could help me with?
The first one I'm placing is on private land (with footpaths running across) so establishing landowner permissions isn't a problem. I've also got a mind to place some more caches on a footpath nearer to where I live in Swindon centre. How do you go about establishing where to ask to get permissions to place a cache? I had a look on the landowner permissions database on the GAGB page already...
Otherwise do I just tick the box to say I have permission and wing it?
Ready for another dumb question? Great! Then I'll begin....
I notice that when caches are first published on GC.com they very often don't have hints etc. Once the cache is reviewed & published, is the CO owner then able to edit the log directly? Do any changes made need further review, eg co-ordinate changes?
Once the cache is reviewed and published you are able to edit much of it yourself at any time without getting the reviewers involved. Some things you cannot change, one of which is the cache type, e.g. you cannot change your traditional to a multi.
Coordinates can be changed if they need to be via an 'update coordinates' log entry. This will change the coordinates straight away without any reviewer interaction, unless the coordinates are far from the original, are too close to an existing cache, or if a reviewer notices that it has been moved into an area that caches are not permitted.
I put hints on my caches before publishing but some cachers like to make it more difficult for the FTF and then add the hint.
It's best to add extra information into the reviewers box when about to submit it for review, these notes for the reviewer don't get seen by any one else. For example, if it looks like it's near a building but isn't on or by the building, I state this, or it if is close to a National Trust boundary, again I state exactly where the cache is to show it is outside this boundary. Any extra information given to the reviewer helps your submission. There are times when there isn't much to say to the reviewer, as the cache placement is well away from anything, so there isn't much you can say.
The changing of co-ordinates after a cache has been published can be done by the CO as long as the distance is no greater than 528ft and what Gackt said, if a reviewer notices that your change of co-ordinates contravenes a rule.