After trying several things, it appears that I can only connect to cacheface.social via an old XP laptop using I.E. v8, using Firefox v30 (it was v29 when I first tried but Firefox auto upgraded) on the XP laptop gets the waiting message.
As for my Windows 8.1 laptop (the one I actually use), I get the waiting message for both Firefox v30 and I.E. v11.0.2
Explain that one
I managed to signup using my old laptop but will not be using cacheface.social if this is the only way to connect
After trying several things, it appears that I can only connect to cacheface.social via an old XP laptop using I.E. v8, using Firefox v30 (it was v29 when I first tried but Firefox auto upgraded) on the XP laptop gets the waiting message.
As for my Windows 8.1 laptop (the one I actually use), I get the waiting message for both Firefox v30 and I.E. v11.0.2
Explain that one
I managed to signup using my old laptop but will not be using cacheface.social if this is the only way to connect
I occasionally get other sites loading like you show cacheface.social is for you. It is usually because there is some connection problem and after a few minutes pages come back to normal, even had it for this forum. I really don't know why you are just getting it for CF.
Paul said it might be to do with some settings on the machines you are using, and mentioned that the new site uses the latest AJAX technologies and it might be something with that which is not compatible for what you are using. By some functions on this proboard forum also use, and you don't have a problem here as far as I know. It is weird, I'll keep thinking.
It is odd, as I don't have problems like this with any other web site I visit, including the old cacheface site.
It is the only .social domain site I visit and wonder if there is an issue some where along my ISP route over the Internet with this domain or am I just clutching at straws
The last time I had a basic text screen like that showing instead of a proper web page was last time I was in Asda wallmart in Swindon. It was when I was viewing this forum, but going through their free wifi, I guessed it was just something they had in place blocking some of the content.
If you get a chance some time to use your laptop on someone else's internet, maybe have a try at the site again then to see if that makes any difference. If it works then it's something with your net connection your end, or your ISP doing something. Though why it's just for the one site mystifies me.
If you get a chance some time to use your laptop on someone else's internet, maybe have a try at the site again then to see if that makes any difference. If it works then it's something with your net connection your end, or your ISP doing something. Though why it's just for the one site mystifies me.
This was my thought, wondering if its my connection to the Internet (perhaps not clutching at straws)
re the message to you walktall on CF, if you touch the red circled area below when on a member who has requested to be your friend, more options pop up so you can accept or ignore, or request to be a friend yourself.
If you are using the full site the options are much more clear.
Gackt: I tried Full Screen on my Android tablet and got the same issue I have on the PC. This suggests even more that it is an issue with my provider or the site.
Makes me wonder if others are having problems and have just given up with the new cacheface site?
I've tried I.E. v11 and v8, Firefox v29 and v30 and used three different computers
I have only successfully connected on my Android tablet using the cut down (mobile) version of the web site. When I went to full version of the web site on my tablet, I got the same connection issues - "waiting".
Most people I think would have given up by now but it intrigues me why just this one web site I have connection issues with, out of the many many web sites I connect with with out issue, including the old cacheface site
I haven't logged into cacheface.social for while. I have just tried, and keeps directing me to facebook!? I might be under the influence of a tin or 4, but not that incoherent to make me think it is me that is doing something wrong. Anybody else still use it, and is it still there?